Lesson 8: Source Evaluation

When it comes to judging the credibility and reliability of news reports, you the news consumer have two main concerns: Evidence and Sources.

The last lesson was all about evidence, and its accumulation, which is the verification process that’s essential to V.I.A. We thought about the qualitative difference between Direct and Indirect evidence. 

In this lesson, we look closer at the people who are quoted in a news report who provide evidence.


Why Sources Matter

You recall that in a previous lesson, we referenced a key case study that explains why the analyzing of sources is important--that of former New York Times' reporter Judith Miller. After the attacks on 9/11, Ms. Miller, a Washingon bureau reporter became a key figure in the controversy over the reasoning and reporting used to support the 2003 invasion of Iraq after she released a number of stories that emphasized the presence of a Weapons of Mass Destruction program in the country. Ms. Miller got her information from sources that she had previously relied on in Iraq. However, in these cases, the sources turned out to give her information that was flat out wrong. This case had huge implications, with the Bush administration using these reports as evidence that Iraq had weapons of Mass Destruction, and intended to use them. The case to invade had been made, and troops were sent in. 

However, as we now know, there were no weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. 

The New York Times published an apology in May of 2004 and subsequently forced Judith Miller to resign from her job in 2005. 

In it's apology, the Times referred to the sources that were used by Ms. Miller in her reporting: 

“The problematic articles varied in authorship and subject matter, but many shared a common feature. They depended at least in part on information from a circle of Iraqi informants, defectors and exiles bent on ‘regime change’ in Iraq, people whose credibility has come under increasing public debate in recent weeks.”

There were people in our government and elsewhere who had set out to hoodwink the press. But a careful news consumer armed with the ability to evaluate sources for themselves...might not have trusted the New York Times’ reporting because so much of it was based on un-named sources providing unverified, uncorroborated material.

This lesson prepares you to do just that. 


Lesson 8 Contents:

GracelynZackary's picture

There were individuals in our administration and somewhere else who had embarked to dupe the press. Be that as it may, a watchful news customer furnished with the capacity Custom Essay Writing Service to assess hotspots for themselves won't not have confided in the New York Times announcing in light of the fact that such an extensive amount it depended on un-named sources giving unconfirmed uncorroborated material. 

russellrexroad321's picture

I think the Direct evidence proves that arrangements straightforwardly answers the current inquiry. It could point to a right or a wrong answer, this direct evidence addresses the genuine inquiry and Indirect evidence doesn't straightforwardly address the particular inquiry close by, yet in the event that it is assembled with other confirmation. Uk Essay Writing Services

itskate's picture

A few points, for example, restorative research and new specialized data must be up and coming to be significant to perusers. In any case, inclination and assessment trade off even late data Essay Writing Service, shielding it from being objective and dependable. Unquestionably, any association or individual is qualified for a point of view.